C6-11 Zoning District — New York City

Unlike most designations in this set, this one is not a broad category spread across many lots — the city's tax-lot records map it to a single parcel, of 36,228 square feet. Because the count is exactly one, every percentage that follows describes that single lot outright rather than a share across a broader population, and the median and largest-lot figures on record are identical for the same reason: there is only one value to report, not a range. That is a structural fact about how this designation is mapped, not an artifact of incomplete records — the city's file simply carries one lot under this designation.

That lot is recorded as vacant land in full. The building classification on file is 100% vacant, and the land-use record shows the same: 100% vacant land. No residential use is recorded on the parcel, and the file counts 0 homes. The city's tax-lot records carry no reliable year-built or floor-count coverage here — an honest absence rather than a zero, since vacant parcels are not always carried with construction-year data the way built lots are, and a gap in the file is not evidence that nothing has ever stood there or that nothing ever will. Vacant classifications like this one are common enough in the city's tax-lot records generally, though the scale here — a single parcel — is what makes this particular file unusual to profile at all.

What the records do carry is a development figure: a recorded 12 FAR of floor area sits unbuilt against the lot's recorded allowance, and by that measure the parcel shows the full 100% headroom share a fully vacant lot would be expected to record. That is a statement about the gap between what is built and what the file lists as allowed for the site — a records fact, not a claim about what will happen on the lot, and not a forecast of any kind. A gap this size, recorded on a lot with no structures on file, is consistent with land that has stood undeveloped through the period these records cover.

The parcel is not recorded inside a designated historic district on file, and it does not fall inside the mapped federal Special Flood Hazard Area — 0% by both measures, which for a single lot simply means this one parcel misses both maps. Because this designation covers just the one recorded lot, its own page carries the fullest available detail, and the allowance the rules tables above cite for the site is the governing number on file for whatever happens next. Anyone checking this designation is, in effect, checking one specific piece of ground rather than sampling a category, which is worth keeping in mind when reading any of the figures above.