C7-1 Zoning District — New York City

Like a handful of other single-lot designations in this file, this one is mapped to just one tax lot citywide — 100,750 square feet, with no broader population to average across; the median and the largest-lot figures on file are necessarily identical, since the count is exactly one. The building recorded on that lot dates to 1999, a year that falls into none of the three construction windows this profile tracks: after the 1945-to-1975 postwar boom, yet one year short of the since-2000 threshold, and nowhere near the pre-1940 period either. All three era shares on this lot's file read 0% as a result, an outcome worth stating plainly rather than folding into whichever bucket reads closest, since none of the three actually fits.

The recorded building class on the lot is entirely store space, and the land-use record likewise shows the parcel coded 100% commercial and office — a fully built-out, single-use commercial site rather than any residential or mixed pattern. Residential use reads 0% here, yet the file still carries 4 units recorded on the parcel, a detail worth flagging on its own terms rather than smoothing over: a lot can carry a unit count on file without being coded as residential land use, and this one is a clean example of exactly that gap between the two measures. Whoever built or later recorded those 4 units did so inside a fully commercial file.

The one building on the lot rises 1 story, and with a single floor recorded, the share of stock above 6 floors reads 0% almost by construction — there is no room in a one-story building for that threshold to be cleared. The parcel is not recorded inside a designated historic district, and it does not fall inside the mapped federal Special Flood Hazard Area — both readings are 0% on the file as it stands today, an absence worth reading as a statement about the current record rather than a permanent guarantee about either kind of exposure. Nothing on file rules either one out for good; it simply is not what the record shows right now.

The file carries no reliable floor-area-capacity coverage for this designation, so no headroom or residual-FAR figure can be cited for the lot — an absence in the record, not a claim about what could or could not be added to the site. What is on record still covers the essentials for a single parcel: building class, land use, construction year, height, flood status, and historic status are all tracked individually here, even where the development-capacity family is not. The floor-area and height rules that actually govern the designation are set out, with their citations, in the tables above, for whoever checks the file against this one lot.