M1-2/R8 Zoning District — New York City

Three tax lots carry this designation, and on the numbers, every measure of use here agrees with every other: 100% of the lots are coded residential, and 100% fall under a single land-use category, mixed residential-and-commercial buildings. That kind of internal agreement — residential share and land-use share landing on the exact same figure — reflects just how few lots and how consistent a footprint this designation covers, rather than a split across several use categories. With only three parcels on record, there is simply no room for a mixed picture to emerge: whatever the first lot shows, the file shows for all of them.

Height on record is substantial for so small a footprint: a median of 17 stories, with 67% of recorded buildings rising above 6 floors. The recorded building classes split between condominiums, 67% of tracked classes, and mixed residential-commercial buildings at 33%, a pairing that lines up with the land-use figure above. The stock is comparatively recent as well: a median construction year of 2013, with 67% of buildings dated 2000 or later and 33% recorded as predating 1940; none, 0%, fall within the 1945-1975 postwar boom. A tall, largely condominium stock built mostly in the past two decades, with only a minority tracing back before 1940, is the picture these three lots present in full.

100% of these lots are coded residential, and together they record 1,032 homes on just three parcels — a large unit count concentrated onto very little ground, consistent with the height described above. The lots themselves are large and, like every other measure here, identical to one another: both the median and the 90th percentile land on 45,767 square feet. A unit count in the thousands spread across only three parcels of this size confirms what the height figure already suggested: this is dense, vertical residential construction on wide ground rather than a sprawl of smaller buildings.

The development ledger shows recorded headroom on part of the footprint: 33% of lots record floor area below their allowance, with a median residual of 0 FAR. 67% of these lots sit inside the mapped federal flood zone, a statement about the regulatory boundary rather than a record of actual flooding, and 33% carry historic-district status on record — landmark review layered onto a stock built mostly since 2000. Between the flood exposure on two of the three lots and the landmark status on one of them, this small footprint carries more recorded overlay than its short construction history alone would suggest. The floor-area and height rules that actually govern this designation are set out, with citations, in the tables above.