M1-2A/R7A Zoning District — New York City

Only two tax lots citywide carry this designation, a small footprint, and most of the usual measures this file tracks are simply not available for them: no reliable year-built coverage, no floor coverage, no land-use breakdown, and no residential-share figure. What survives on so thin a file is still worth stating plainly rather than filled in by guesswork, and what survives is consistent and complete on its own terms. With a footprint of only two parcels, gaps in one field can leave the file with almost nothing to say on that measure, which is exactly what happened here for age, height, land use, and residential share alike.

Both recorded lots show floor area below their allowance — 100% on record — with a median residual of 3.8 FAR. The building classes split evenly: utility properties account for 50% of tracked classes and a miscellaneous building class the other 50%, on lots with a median size of 29,463 square feet — both the median and the 90th percentile land on that same figure, meaning the two parcels are close in scale to one another. A perfectly even split between two building classes, on two lots of nearly matching size, is about as simple a picture as a two-lot footprint can present.

Only a single home is recorded on either of these two parcels, and the file does not carry a residential-share percentage for them at all — an absence rather than a zero, since a genuine 0% would still be a recorded figure and this field simply has none. Land use is similarly uncovered: no land-use breakdown is available for these lots, another gap rather than a claim about what stands here. Between the utility-and-miscellaneous building classes and the single recorded home, the two lots read as non-residential in practice even though the file cannot confirm that with a residential-share figure.

What the file does confirm: 0% of these two lots sit inside the mapped federal flood zone, and 0% carry historic-district status. For a designation mapped across so few parcels, the file is candid about what it does and does not know — recorded floor area and building class on one hand, and open gaps in age, height, land use, and residential share on the other. That combination of confirmed capacity data and honest gaps elsewhere is itself the clearest picture this two-lot footprint can offer. The floor-area rules that actually govern this designation are set out, with citations, in the tables above.